<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
		>

<channel>
	<title>Trained by JP | K | Favorites</title>
	<link>https://www.trainedbyjp.com/members/kalarsan/activity/favorites/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://www.trainedbyjp.com/members/kalarsan/activity/favorites/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed of K's saved posts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 12:47:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.14.4</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
		
								<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">839e8c07b47fdfcb3f4027509ddbcf59</guid>
				<title>Hilly replied to the discussion Test vs Deca vs Eq for bulking in the forum Supplementation</title>
				<link>https://www.trainedbyjp.com/forums/topic/test-vs-deca-vs-eq-for-bulking/#post-1022189</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2021 14:25:31 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class = "activity-discussion-title-wrap"><a href="https://www.trainedbyjp.com/forums/topic/test-vs-deca-vs-eq-for-bulking/#post-1022189"><span class="bb-reply-lable">Reply to</span> Test vs Deca vs Eq for bulking</a></p> <div class="bb-content-inr-wrap"><p>NPP/ deca is more anabolic and thus will create more muscle. </p>
<p>Then it’s about what you need from the other drugs and managing estro </p>
<p>If you do some form of performance sport then EQ may help </p>
<p>If your a real big guy then EQ may also help </p>
<p>Increased RBC</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>
		