Brandon
Forum Replies Created
-
What would you attribute the really bad pip to?
-
Hey Jordan just wanted to say I absolutely love the education section videos! Tbh I favor them over the training videos because my favorite thing is to just keep learning and especially from people like you and Corrine who have years of experience, and the education with application to back it up! This site is the best investment I have ever made in terms of my bodybuilding career
-
I do find it crazy that bodybuilders get such a bad rep about steroids and shit when you see ZERO negative comments on powerlifters using AAS when they in comparison use a lot more than bodybuilders do… and there sport is widely streamed on top sports channels and everything but you never hear them talk negatively… makes no sense…
-
Holy fuck that’s a lot… wow… I was thinking extreme but god damn that is next level fucing extreme…. I would love to see his blood work after the lift… I could only assume everything would be absolutely sky high and near death levels!?
-
Another days rest I’m absolutely trashed from legs yesterday, had some limited time to get my training in so session was rather short.
We can all agree this lock down is now getting on everyone’s nerves a lot, really can’t see this being sustainable much longer for the public._________________________________________
Instagram- kuba_cielen | http://www.trainedbyjpclothing.com – The most anabolic clothing ever! | http://www.trainedbyjp-nutrition.com – highest quality supplements on the market.
Man that’s complete bullshit that someone would report you when your training in your own damn gym and it’s closed to the public… some people have nothing better to do but try and bring other people down with them… makes no fucking sense…
-
Hey Jordan, just watched your nandrolone video and I now see that your adding test in with nandrolone. Is this because of the reasons yo stated in the video such as when bodyweight drops it helps you keep the fuller look? Or is there a different reason why you’ve added it in now?
-
@andrewjill after comparing test to tren, how would you compare npp / deca (nandrolone ) to tren on a mg to mg basis
Again it’s very difficult to compare, like apples and oranges, but I would say they are equal, however IMO nandrolone can be pushed further as it doesn’t drive you insane, there is a cut point for tren where more equals greater sides – as with any compound but you pay for it far more with tren, and IMO Tren is for precontest or powerlifting peaking, outside of that you can use other things to achieve equal anabolism without destroying your mind, but that’s just me, I have know powerlifters run 200mg tren ace a day when peaking and come out the other end fine, I know I wouldn’t
Hope this helps , any questions fire away
Regards – Andrew [/quote]
Awesome feedback! Thank you! I personally love npp is the offseason / gaining phase and tried tren for the first time last prep and was absolutely insane… strength went through the fuckin roof while dropping cals and doing shit tones of cardio…Since you brought up powerlifting… what do you think Thor would have been taking for his peak on that 501kg deadlift the other day? Tren, halo? Just curious
-
@andrewjill after comparing test to tren, how would you compare npp / deca (nandrolone ) to tren on a mg to mg basis
-
Anyone ever used med-tech npp? How did you find it?
Also has anyone ever ordered med tech to Canada? Would love to try their product but every time I try any uk sources packs get busted…
-
Only tried dbol at 20mg pre workout and loved it! Felt much rounder and stronger and didn’t get any negative sides! Wanted to try anadrol but stuck with dbol since it is the least faked
-
The higher the test dose the higher the chances are of building and maintaining more tissue, however, there is a limit. I would say for a large professional bodybuilder there would be no need to go over 1g of test per week, the optimal being 500 to 750mg per week to avoid unnecessary side effects. Testosterone is the most effective compound for building tissue ad all of the other compounds are derived from testosterone.
_________________________________________
Instagram:@primitivegymnasium | http://www.trainedbyjpclothing.com – The most anabolic clothing ever! |
http://www.trainedbyjp-nutrition.com – highest quality supplements on the market.
Why would you say test is the best for building tissue? Doesn’t it. Have a ratio of 100:100 where something like tren is 500:500? Wouldn’t tren be way better at building tissue or even nandrolone?? [/quote]
Anabolic and androgenic ratios are confusing when relating them to real world results. To cut a long story short, Like the lads said its very individual, some like high test, comparatively I have also heard of those running a base of deca/winstrol
To give you the longer story for those interested, AAS studies (with the exception of a few) are unethical and therefore many of such ratio information is derived from mice muscle analysis, and therefore do not provide an exact comparison to humans.
Take for example methytrienlone, essentially oral trenbolone, well add a 7-alpha methyl group and you have the lesser-known dimethtrienolone with an anabolic: androgenic ratio of both exceeding 10,000. How does that relate to testosterone (100:100)? It does not.
You mentioned Trenbolone with a 500:500 and testosterone at 100:100 which is correct, but in the real world this does not mean a cycle of 100mg of tren a week is equal to cycle of 500mg of testosterone. We all know the testosterone would come out on top. Many other examples, Winstrol with anabolic ratio of 320, but in the real world in term of actual anabolic gains is not 3.2 times stronger. Again, this is due to mice data.
This suggests that testosterone may have a separate properties which result in anabolism. See Fig1*, provides some pathways of anabolism
‘The mechanism of anabolic action due to the administration of anabolic/androgenic steroids. AAS causes not only direct stimulation of the androgen receptor, but also supports muscle growth by increasing the levels of free androgens, increasing androgen receptor density, inhibiting corticosteroid action, increasing GH/IGF-1, and suppressing IGF-1 binding proteins’*.
With Testosterone a strong supporting argument has been provided in each area in the referenced text*, but is far too exhaustive to discuss each area in a post, but makes very interesting reading, and these pathways are certainly not limited to testosterone, but I am just giving you an example.
Now again, this discussion provided on testosterone is scientific, it provides some possible mechanism of why testosterone is rather effective in the male body at building muscle, and also noting that AA ratios are generally based on rat data.
Hope this clarifies a few things
Regards – Andrew
Reference
William Llewellyn’s Anabolic 9th Edition
[/quote]
That’s some great knowledge ???? what do you think and equal dosage of tren to test would be taking into account the strength of the two compounds? Like 300mg of tren would be equal to how much rest in your opinion??[/quote]
You’re most welcome, I completely forgot to add the fig1 I have referenced you, I have edited the post, you might find it helpful
Very difficult to compare, almost apples and oranges, if we were to look at an hypothetical scenario of 2 twins and both did a 12 cycle and after the 12 week mark we give the testosterone enough time to clear to reduce intramuscular water retention that would appear as muscle on cycle, and you would normally never run tren alone which is why one reason such comparison is rather complicated, but to throw a ball park figure at you which truthfully do to aforementioned reason is guessing to quite an extent, 250mg of testosterone maybe equivalent to 150, if taken alone, but most of know the theory of synergy between steroids , so to almost contradict what I have just said if i ran 250 test and 150 tren, then now those figures no longer stand as I think that cycle would be more effective than 500mg test (dependant on experience), so now it becomes a sliding scale me, If you get, so as you can see very complicated to compare. Many will wildly disagree with numbers, and please don’t quote any of my knowledge to be based on the above paragraph, that’s purely an hypothetical scenario
What would be far easier to do is when you come to run tren next tag me in a thread and I shall come and tell you what I think may have some equivalence in that given scenario
Glad I can be of some help
Regards – Andrew [/quote]
Ya I get what you are saying… what exactly is it about tren that increases IGF1 or sensitizes is to it more than any other compound? -
The higher the test dose the higher the chances are of building and maintaining more tissue, however, there is a limit. I would say for a large professional bodybuilder there would be no need to go over 1g of test per week, the optimal being 500 to 750mg per week to avoid unnecessary side effects. Testosterone is the most effective compound for building tissue ad all of the other compounds are derived from testosterone.
_________________________________________
Instagram:@primitivegymnasium | http://www.trainedbyjpclothing.com – The most anabolic clothing ever! |
http://www.trainedbyjp-nutrition.com – highest quality supplements on the market.
Why would you say test is the best for building tissue? Doesn’t it. Have a ratio of 100:100 where something like tren is 500:500? Wouldn’t tren be way better at building tissue or even nandrolone?? [/quote]
Anabolic and androgenic ratios are confusing when relating them to real world results. To cut a long story short, Like the lads said its very individual, some like high test, comparatively I have also heard of those running a base of deca/winstrol
To give you the longer story for those interested, AAS studies (with the exception of a few) are unethical and therefore many of such ratio information is derived from mice muscle analysis, and therefore do not provide an exact comparison to humans.
Take for example methytrienlone, essentially oral trenbolone, well add a 7-alpha methyl group and you have the lesser-known dimethtrienolone with an anabolic: androgenic ratio of both exceeding 10,000. How does that relate to testosterone (100:100)? It does not.
You mentioned Trenbolone with a 500:500 and testosterone at 100:100 which is correct, but in the real world this does not mean a cycle of 100mg of tren a week is equal to cycle of 500mg of testosterone. We all know the testosterone would come out on top. Many other examples, Winstrol with anabolic ratio of 320, but in the real world in term of actual anabolic gains is not 3.2 times stronger. Again, this is due to mice data.
This suggests that testosterone may have a separate properties which result in anabolism. See Fig1*, provides some pathways of anabolism
‘The mechanism of anabolic action due to the administration of anabolic/androgenic steroids. AAS causes not only direct stimulation of the androgen receptor, but also supports muscle growth by increasing the levels of free androgens, increasing androgen receptor density, inhibiting corticosteroid action, increasing GH/IGF-1, and suppressing IGF-1 binding proteins’*.
With Testosterone a strong supporting argument has been provided in each area in the referenced text*, but is far too exhaustive to discuss each area in a post, but makes very interesting reading, and these pathways are certainly not limited to testosterone, but I am just giving you an example.
Now again, this discussion provided on testosterone is scientific, it provides some possible mechanism of why testosterone is rather effective in the male body at building muscle, and also noting that AA ratios are generally based on rat data.
Hope this clarifies a few things
Regards – Andrew
Reference
William Llewellyn’s Anabolic 9th Edition
[/quote]
That’s some great knowledge ???? what do you think and equal dosage of tren to test would be taking into account the strength of the two compounds? Like 300mg of tren would be equal to how much rest in your opinion?? -
The higher the test dose the higher the chances are of building and maintaining more tissue, however, there is a limit. I would say for a large professional bodybuilder there would be no need to go over 1g of test per week, the optimal being 500 to 750mg per week to avoid unnecessary side effects. Testosterone is the most effective compound for building tissue ad all of the other compounds are derived from testosterone.
_________________________________________
Instagram:@primitivegymnasium | http://www.trainedbyjpclothing.com – The most anabolic clothing ever! |
http://www.trainedbyjp-nutrition.com – highest quality supplements on the market.
Why would you say test is the best for building tissue? Doesn’t it. Have a ratio of 100:100 where something like tren is 500:500? Wouldn’t tren be way better at building tissue or even nandrolone??
-
For me the prescription one every time, so Nordi, plus Nordi is ok out of the fridge for 21 days. You have a nice selection to choose from.
Regards – Andrew
Reference
All unused Norditropin® products must be refrigerated (36°F to 46°F) prior to first use. Do not freeze and avoid direct light. After first injection, Norditropin® pens can either be stored outside of the refrigerator (up to 77°F) for use within 3 weeks, or in the refrigerator (between 36°F and 46°F) for use within 4 weeks.How much does your scrip nordi cost?? Scrip Nutropin cost $500 CAD for 30iu
-
Norris or geno